<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Dee and Rob	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelbgreen.com.au/dee-and-rob/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelbgreen.com.au/dee-and-rob/</link>
	<description>Journalist, producer and oral historian</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2016 04:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Sue		</title>
		<link>http://michaelbgreen.com.au/dee-and-rob/#comment-168</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sue]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-168</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Hi Michael,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So heartening to read this after reading your story in The Big Issue.&#160; I feel like the grassroots are always where it is - individual people helping individual people.&#160; Unfortunately charities are burdened under the red tape that comes with any organisation.&#160; Person to person sure cuts out a whole lot of middleman guff.&#160; I look at crowdfunding sites and wonder if in the future there couldn&#039;t be something that links up people needing help with people who are willing to give it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Of course, one of the first things that comes to mind for a lot of people when contemplating something like that is, &quot;Yeah, but what about people taking advantage?&quot;&#160; That underlying fear that someone in need is actually tricking you, or taking advantage, or &quot;rorting the system&quot; or whatever is a difficult one to trevail, and I guess that&#039;s probably why charities tend to have that sort of a &quot;prove yourself&quot; focus in the first place, to try to weed out that element of human nature.&#160;&#160; I can&#039;t help thinking though that maybe the wheat and the chaff need to be allowed to stay mixed in together - that too much weeding out harms already fragile people in vulnerable situations who &lt;em&gt;are &lt;/em&gt;trying to do it straight.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anyway, thanks so much for posting this, it was very heartening.&#160; I loved your story in The Big Issue. &#160; It&#039;s a mag that I have had a longstanding fondness before (even before they published my first paid-for writing piece last year :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cheers,&lt;br /&gt;Sue&#160;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Michael,</p>
<p>So heartening to read this after reading your story in The Big Issue.&nbsp; I feel like the grassroots are always where it is &#8211; individual people helping individual people.&nbsp; Unfortunately charities are burdened under the red tape that comes with any organisation.&nbsp; Person to person sure cuts out a whole lot of middleman guff.&nbsp; I look at crowdfunding sites and wonder if in the future there couldn&#8217;t be something that links up people needing help with people who are willing to give it.</p>
<p>Of course, one of the first things that comes to mind for a lot of people when contemplating something like that is, &#8220;Yeah, but what about people taking advantage?&#8221;&nbsp; That underlying fear that someone in need is actually tricking you, or taking advantage, or &#8220;rorting the system&#8221; or whatever is a difficult one to trevail, and I guess that&#8217;s probably why charities tend to have that sort of a &#8220;prove yourself&#8221; focus in the first place, to try to weed out that element of human nature.&nbsp;&nbsp; I can&#8217;t help thinking though that maybe the wheat and the chaff need to be allowed to stay mixed in together &#8211; that too much weeding out harms already fragile people in vulnerable situations who <em>are </em>trying to do it straight.</p>
<p>Anyway, thanks so much for posting this, it was very heartening.&nbsp; I loved your story in The Big Issue. &nbsp; It&#8217;s a mag that I have had a longstanding fondness before (even before they published my first paid-for writing piece last year 🙂</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />Sue&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lex		</title>
		<link>http://michaelbgreen.com.au/dee-and-rob/#comment-169</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-169</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://michaelbgreen.com.au/dee-and-rob/#comment-168&quot;&gt;Sue&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for this article, Michael. Your original article about Dee and Michael struck a chord with me and what Rob&#039;s doing is just incredible.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://michaelbgreen.com.au/dee-and-rob/#comment-168">Sue</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for this article, Michael. Your original article about Dee and Michael struck a chord with me and what Rob&#8217;s doing is just incredible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
