Michael Green

Writer and producer

  • About
  • Print
  • Audio
  • Podcast
  • Projects
  • Book
  • Twitter

Residential stormwater

In Greener Homes on July 25, 2010

Capturing runoff helps keep gardens green and waterways clean.

Thanks to the drought, householders have become fit hauling greywater buckets and relaxed using rainwater tanks. But there’s still another source to tap: stormwater.

“In most places, rain runs off the roof or the paving to the gutters in the street,” says Stuart McQuire, author of Water Not Down the Drain. “On the way it collects rubbish and pollutants and it all flows into creeks and waterways. In Melbourne it ends up in Port Phillip Bay.”

By reducing stormwater, we not only cut pollution in our waterways, but also trap a valuable resource for our gardens.

Mr McQuire also runs an eco-audit business, Green Makeover. His first tip for restricting runoff is to install a tank and catch rainwater before it becomes stormwater. The next thing to consider is landscaping. “Go into the garden when it’s raining and see where the puddles are and where water is flowing,” he suggests.

You can control the flow by creating swales – hollows or ridges that run across the slope of your block. They slow the water, allowing it time to seep into the soil. “Swales can be very subtle. They can be part of your lawn, or they can be mulched and part of your garden,” he says. “They’re great at retaining water for trees or deep-rooted shrubs.

Stormwater gushes across hard surfaces such as concrete driveways. At his house, Mr McQuire has paths that are mulched or made of broken concrete with gaps that let the water find the earth. Gravel or porous paving also allow moisture to soak in.

“You don’t necessarily have to dig up all your concrete. You could retrofit porous sections across a driveway that let the water through,” he says.

The high-cost option for stormwater collection is to install an underground tank that allows water to infiltrate through the soil, or accepts the flow from stormwater pipes. Mr McQuire estimates they cost from $1000 per 1000 litres, installed.

Another way to sop up the excess is to create a rain garden, “a garden that waters itself,” according to Pat Arundell from Rain Gardens Australia.

It’s a demonstration of wisdom, not wizardry. Around the home, the gardens are placed to capture water from downpipes or runoff from hard surfaces. “They can fit neatly into small spaces and they’re very hardy,” says Mr Arundell.

Rain gardens filter out heavy metals, oils and litter, as well as the excess nutrients that can cause algal blooms in waterways. Earlier this year, Melbourne Water launched a campaign aiming for 10,000 rain gardens throughout the city by 2013. The authority has excellent information sheets online, including detailed guides on size, materials and plant selection.

Mr Arundell says the choice of plants is crucial “They need to be able to sustain dry spells, but also have wet feet from time to time.” He’s found many native grasses well suited to the task.

The other non-negotiable element of any rain garden is the overflow – neither your foundations nor your neighbours will appreciate the consequences of poor planning. “You need to design the garden so it can overflow back into the stormwater,” Mr Arundell says. “And you need a plumber to make those connections.”

The same warning goes for swales or other drainage alterations: make sure you consider where the water will go in a downpour.

For more information, see the stormwater guide on Your Home.

Raising the roof

In Blog on July 21, 2010

THE assembly is over. The courtyard studio lives!

One afternoon not long ago, Michael Kelly and I gathered what we had built over the last few months: five separate segments of the frame, ten panels of cladding and eight shutters for saloon-style swinging doors.

Michael had cleared a space inside his shop. He decided to display the little building there, for passers-by to see (and perhaps, order one of their own).

We began to assemble the pieces, inching the frames into contact with one another. Accurate measurements are particularly important for a modular building like ours. One length awry and a whole panel might not fit.

Hence, the carpenter’s maxim: ‘measure twice, cut once’. Michael stated his variation on the accepted wisdom while we slotted the panels together, as certain as jigsaw pieces. “Measure and re-measure, and check and re-check, over and over again,” he said.

And indeed he had. As we laid out each panel, he had measured, scribbled numbers on his hand, returned to the frame, then measured again and again; back and forth like a cook between pantry and pot.

I’ve just read a book by the American writer Michael Pollan, called A Place of My Own: The Architecture of Daydreams. It is his story of building a small, wooden hut on his property in Connecticut. While he learns to build, training his “radically” unhandy hands, Pollan ponders the nature of shelter and the history of architecture.

Although the hut appeared small and simple, the architect’s design was deeply considered and intricate. Pollan’s project took two-and-a-half years of Sundays to realise.

He built the frame from Douglas Fir, commonly known here as Oregon – the same timber we used for our studio. On the day they raised the roof’s ridge pole, Pollan recalled feeling abashed when he first saw the fir timbers he’d ordered; being, as they were, milled from hundred-year-old trees.

In the early years of the American colony, carpenters would mark the topping out of the frame by nailing a bough of a conifer to the highest beam of the structure. Pollan enacted the tradition, and speculated on its role in celebrating the new dwelling and the achievement of the workers, and also recognising the trees cut down for it.

“People have traditionally turned to ritual to help them frame, acknowledge and ultimately even find joy in just such a paradox of being human – the fact that so much of what we desire for our happiness and need for our survival comes at a heavy cost. We kill to eat, cut down trees to build our homes, we exploit other people and the earth.”

It seems to me that Pollan’s “heavy cost” of being human rises or falls according to the choices we make as individuals, and those of our societies as a whole. But he’s right: there is always a cost.

One of the rewards of working in the physical world could be a heightened appreciation of its materials, a better understanding of the composition of the things we use. The makers among us must be more aware of the stuff of life, and perhaps, too, the damaged goods discarded along the way.

We did not nail an evergreen bough to our studio. It is made from timber carefully reclaimed from demolition sites. Several decades sheltered us from the full force of the paradox.

For our ritual, we stood side-by-side, arms crossed, leaning back ever so slightly, and murmured the studio’s praise. “It’s one thing to have an idea, but another to put it into practice,” Michael said.

The studio

Sustainable housing developments

In Greener Homes on July 19, 2010

A British initiative foreshadows a new approach for Australian developers.

Pooran Desai lives and works in a world-renowned urban project that pioneers eco- and community-conscious design. The Beddington Zero (fossil) Energy Development (BedZED), in South London, comprises 100 houses and units, as well as commercial, community and public space.

Its residents consume half as much electricity and drive nearly two-thirds fewer kilometres than the national average. They’ve got good access to public transport, bikeways and fresh local food. They also know about 20 neighbours by name.

“The overlap between sustainable lifestyle, community spirit, good health and low carbon emissions is very strong,” says Mr Desai, founder of BioRegional, which completed the BedZED project in 2002.

That holistic approach may soon find a home in Australia. Mr Desai visited Melbourne recently to work with local developers and councils. He met with Moreland City Council to discuss the Coburg Initiative, the council’s plan to create new housing, retail space and jobs in central Coburg.

Among his key arguments is that developers must carefully manage vehicle access onsite. “Cars connect people over long distances, but they actually disconnect you from your neighbours,” Mr Desai says. “At BedZED we removed cars from the centre of the development. We only have limited parking at the periphery. Kids play in the streets and in the public space, and parents don’t worry. Then parents meet each other and start talking.”

BioRegional has created the One Planet Communities framework, a set of principles and targets to help property developers reach for the highest environmental and social standards. It begins with the ecological footprint concept: assessing what the planet can produce renewably and how much of those resources we’re using.

“It turns out that globally we’re consuming about 40 per cent more each year than the planet can sustain,” he says. “But countries are consuming at very different rates.” If everyone on earth lived like the average Australian, we would need three planets to meet our consumption.

The One Planet principles include zero waste, sustainable materials, food, water and transport, and equity and local economy. They are now being applied to about 100,000 homes around the world, from the USA to the UAE.

“We try to make it easy for people to live happy and healthy lives, but within a fair share of the earth’s resources, so they only have a one-planet footprint. We can do that at the same time as increasing quality of life,” he says.

Barangaroo, a high-profile redevelopment in inner city Sydney, is a candidate to join the network. Lend Lease won the bid for the first stage, a commercial and residential precinct next to the existing CBD. The company is working with BioRegional on an action plan that would see the project meet the One Planet guidelines.

Mr Desai believes that the development industry is on the brink of a significant shift, one that will focus on creating sustainable lifestyles. The newest BioRegional development in the UK, One Brighton, has shown the model to be commercially successful. The 172 apartments were built for the same cost as conventional projects, and have delivered higher returns.

“One Brighton is completely car free,” Mr Desai says. “As a developer, we save huge amounts of money on that, so we invested in the renewable energy system and in higher quality, natural building materials. It’s selling better than other developments in England’s south-east.”

Retrofitting older homes

In Greener Homes on July 11, 2010

Older homes have the potential for energy efficiency on the cheap.

NEW houses must comply with six star energy regulations from next May. But what about our existing homes – how do they rate and how can we best improve them?

The Moreland Energy Foundation and Sustainability Victoria recently studied the energy performance of a group of older homes. “The vast majority of houses are estimated to have two stars or less,” says Govind Maksay from the foundation. “The 15 houses we studied were even worse – the average was 1.3 stars and a couple of them achieved no rating at all.”

The researchers surveyed each dwelling and calculated its energy rating. They modelled a series of upgrades to the building fabric: ceiling, wall and floor insulation, draught proofing, drapes and pelmets, external shading and double-glazed windows.

With all the measures in place, the houses jumped to an average of 4.3 stars, for an average cost of about $22,500.

However, the changes weren’t all equal, in either impact or cost. “On average, over 80 per cent of the rating improvement came from the insulation and comprehensive draught proofing,” Mr Maksay says, “but that constituted just 20 per cent of the total upgrade cost.” In contrast, double-glazing proved highly expensive for more limited benefit.

Although these findings vary according to the dwelling and the modelling undertaken, Mr Maksay says householders can learn important lessons from the study: seal your gaps and insulate your walls and ceilings.

“To really improve your star rating you have to tackle wall insulation, whether that’s with blow-in granulated rockwool or by removing the weatherboards or plasterboard and inserting batts.

“The other message is that there’s a difference between wimpy and comprehensive draught sealing. Really blocking up gaps and cracks has a big impact.”

If you live in an older house, your heating probably comes and goes like the wind. Choose your tactics carefully and you’ll bump up your rating at little expense. “It’s highly achievable for existing houses to get near the five-star standard. You can get a big bang for your buck,” Mr Maksay says.

With that advice in mind, an alliance of environment and welfare groups is launching One Million Homes, a retrofitting campaign aiming to transform half the Victorian housing stock over five years, beginning with low-income households.

Damien Moyse, from the Alternative Technology Association, says we have much room for improvement. Three in ten Victorian households are still using power-hungry electric storage hot water systems.

The scheme would cost an average of $2500 per house, Mr Moyse says. “Governments have already committed two-thirds of that under existing rebates and programs.”

A retrofitting scheme would cut greenhouse gas emissions and water consumption, and save householders about $290 per year. “It would make properties more liveable in the context of rising temperatures and more extreme weather events,” he says, “and target people who can’t afford to install some of these technologies.”

If you want even more impetus to insulate, visit the green building events scheduled during the State of Design Festival, from July 14 to 25.

Next weekend, Sanctuary magazine is setting up speed dating with sustainable architects and development firm Brutal Art is conducting green design workshops. The following weekend there’ll be open houses and courses in Castlemaine and Bendigo, all for free.

Testing toasters

In Blog on July 6, 2010

ON SUNDAY night, Green’s Guess Appliance Repair spluttered into action. Two foolhardy customers had emerged after my initial post, proffering three broken toasters and one silent doorbell.

So I called on my friend Craig, who is a mechanic and knowledgeable fix-it man, far more comfortable in the real world than I could ever daydream to be.

When I arrived at his house down along the bay, I found him in conversation with his neighbour Chris, who happens to be an electrical engineer. On this particular evening, Chris’s feet were unsteady and his eyes akimbo. I deduced that the stubby of cider in his hand was contributing to the malfunction. First puzzle solved.

On learning of my quest, Chris was eager to pass on his wisdom in all matters electrical. He fixed me in his sights, and pointed at me: “The most important thing, the most important thing in the whole deal is this…” he began, then gripped my shoulder and paused dramatically, in the manner of fine Irish storytellers the world over. “Electricity will fookin‘ kill ya.”

Good advice, and I won’t forget it: don’t mess with anything that is plugged in. 

With safety in mind, Chris refused to let me work on the oldest toaster, which had a melted power cord. (One down, two to go.) A close inspection of the next one revealed a tamper-proof screw for which we did not have a suitable screwdriver. (Two down, one to go.)

The third and final toaster had a broad, angled face and separate levers that reminded me of aircraft controls. We tested it using a multimeter, displaying ohms, which are a measure of electrical resistance – sort of like friction, but for electricity. By placing the two probes of the multimeter on the prongs of the toaster’s plug, we could see how the current was travelling round. It wasn’t.

We then plugged it in, switched it on and eased the levers into flight mode. No take-off. As Craig unplugged it and set about removing the cover, I remembered David from Swann’s Small Appliance Repair warning me that manufacturers make it extremely difficult to dismantle their goods so that people can’t electrocute themselves. He also warned me that toasters were often unfixable these days.

While Craig prised, I practiced connecting and soldering wires, according to his instructions. “The secret to soldering is to heat the wire, then touch the solder on it,” he said. “And you should never leave wire exposed, so use electrical tape or heat shrink to cover the connection.”

On contact with the hot copper wire, the solder looked like mercury: a silver shimmer encasing the orange strands.

After much twiddling, Craig announced: “All right, we’re in!” Then, ten minutes later, he finally removed the cover. We blew out crumbs, analysed the mechanism and used the multimeter probes to test the resistance at various points of the circuit, but after an hour, still couldn’t find the glitch. (Three down.)

The doorbell, however, was a ringing success. We used the mulitmeter, set to volts, to confirm that the battery was charged. Then we took all the parts out, tested the switch on the circuit board, and put it all back together. And … ding dong!

I am emboldened by my attempt. I’ve resolved to procure a multimeter and a set of screwdrivers for tamper-proof screws. So give me your tired toasters, your poor gadgets: Green’s Guess is marginally better than ever before.

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • …
  • 80
  • Next Page »

Archive

    • ►Print
      • ►Environment
      • ►Social justice
      • ►Community development
      • ►Culture
    • ►Blog
    • ►Audio
    • ►Projects

© Copyright 2017 Michael Green · All Rights Reserved