Michael Green

Writer and producer

  • About
  • Print
  • Audio
  • Podcast
  • Projects
  • Book
  • Twitter

Home occupancy

In Greener Homes on May 22, 2011

Why big households are better than big houses

OVER the last century, Australians have lived increasingly alone. When the first national census was conducted in 1911, an average of 4.5 people lived in each home. By the most recent census, the number had nearly halved.

But at the same time, we’ve been building bigger houses – a report by CommSec in late 2009 found our new dwellings were the world’s largest – and affordability has fallen.

As permaculture founder David Holmgren summarises: “We’ve got bigger houses, with more stuff and fewer people in them.”

Proportionally, smaller households use more energy and create more greenhouse emissions than larger ones.

“As you get down to double- and single-person homes, the efficiency of the household economy falls,” Mr Holmgren says. “Food preparation, food wastage, heating, cleaning and maintenance all become a bigger load for less benefit.

“And when it comes to more self-reliant living, in a small household you can’t do as many things, like growing and preserving food, keeping animals, or your own building and renovation.”

He notes that not only are fewer people living together, but we’re also spending fewer hours at home. The combination forces ever-more development, jams our transport systems and exacerbates social isolation.

“Our cities are crowded by empty buildings under lock and key, with people racing between them – whether it’s to work, the gymnasium, the restaurant or the childcare centre,” he says.

Given the spare capacity in existing housing stock, he argues the case for “higher density living”, not higher density building.

Bigger households, where people are home more often, are likely to be consuming less, producing more of their own needs and contributing to the vitality of the local area.

So how can we live in larger numbers? Mr Holmgren says the two most common ways are to take in boarders or share with extended family.

“From a hard-nosed, self-interested perspective, if you’re a homeowner with a mortgage, renting the spare room out to a boarder is the best thing you can do to reduce your debt burden,” he says.

Likewise, Ed McKinley, of the Groupwork Institute of Australia, argues young people should consider the financial, social and environmental plusses of teaming up to buy a house.

“It’s one way younger people can enter the market and still live in the groovy parts of the city,” he says. “There are big blocks around with enormous scope to be cleverly reconfigured to meet individual, family and group needs.”

From this Friday to Sunday, the institute is running a short course on living and working well together. Mr McKinley draws expertise from nearly three decades living at the Commonground community, near Seymour.

“People are frightened it won’t go well and they won’t get their own space. They’re real concerns, but you can make agreements upfront,” he says. “You can be clear about what is going to happen when someone leaves or if people get into conflict. You can set up good processes and expectations to deal with those things.”

And while the concerns are real, so are the benefits. “It’s about having one block working a lot harder,” he says. “You might need to work less to afford that location. Your utility costs drop dramatically and you may have more capacity to install things like solar panels or solar hot water.”

Star ratings lost in space

In Architecture and building, The Age on May 16, 2011

Governments have failed to ensure house energy ratings become reality

MOST new homes don’t measure up to their energy rating, building industry experts warn. Since the start of May, all new houses and renovations in Victoria must reach six stars, but because of shoddy insulation and inadequate draught sealing, householders’ bills may continue to rise.

Despite steadily lifting the stringency of energy ratings, the industry’s regulators have not enforced those standards in the way homes are built. There is no inspection or auditing process to ensure houses comply with efficiency specifications.

House energy consultant Blair Freeman, from Energy Leaks, says eight out of every ten residences he audits have poorly installed or missing insulation – especially in walls, around window frames and towards the perimeter of ceilings.

“People are paying for a five or six star home and not getting it,” he says. “The rating software is a great start – it gives you an assessment of the drawings – but no one assesses the home.”

Freeman photographs the insides of houses with a thermal camera. If it’s warm outside, the images show hot spots where insulation is gappy. Too often, he says, the new houses in his photos glow like hot coals. “It’s a big problem and it’s all to do with poor installation of insulation.”

Similarly, draught testing company Air Barrier Technologies has found air leakage in new homes to be five to 10 times worse than expected under the star-rating models.

Wayne Liddy, a building surveyor and former president of the Australian Institute of Building Surveyors Victoria, says he’s concerned new houses don’t meet the efficiency expectations of homeowners.

Building surveyors assess compliance with the star rating paperwork, but do not check those features in fabric of the building itself. They are not required to monitor the quality of the installation of insulation or draught sealing.

“There’s a big gap in compliance,” Mr Liddy says. “We could have a very embarrassing situation when mandatory disclosure [of energy ratings at the point of sale or lease] comes in. Most houses that have a building permit with a report giving them five stars may be lucky to get to two stars.”

But Victorian Building Commissioner Tony Arnel says people must understand that the rating scheme is a design tool, not an on-the-ground assessment. “The quality of building varies, like everything in life,” he says.

“Where houses are built that have more air gaps and leakage issues, then potentially they will be below the five-star standard. But that’s not to say those houses don’t comply with the regulations.”

The Building Commission conducts “desk-top audits” of compliance with the rating standards, Mr Arnel says. “Quality assurance is a contractual responsibility between the owner and the builder. That’s what you pay for.”

Kristin Brookfield, building and environment director of the Housing Industry Association, says she has not seen any evidence of a systemic problem. “We will always support the view that our members understand their obligations and are delivering homes to the expectations of the law and the customer.”

Even so, Ms Brookfield says she would not be surprised if some states introduced an extra building inspection targeting energy efficiency measures. “But it needs to be done in a way doesn’t slow everything down and cost thousands of dollars,” she says.

Misgivings about the scheme’s governance extend to the oversight of ratings assessors. Until March this year, Sustainability Victoria was responsible for supervising the performance of accredited house energy raters. However, according to a spokesperson for the agency, due to “resource constraints”, it did not audit any ratings after June 2004 – a gap of nearly seven years.

The role has now been outsourced to the Building Designers Association of Victoria and the Association of Building Sustainability Assessors.

Architect and environmental design consultant Chris Barnett, from Third Skin Sustainability, says this kind of ineffective regulation is undermining the rating scheme’s credibility.

To improve compliance in the industry, Mr Barnett says regulators should urgently consider a range of changes, including random ‘as-built’ audits and additional checks by surveyors or sustainability assessors, along with training and education campaigns for builders.

Why we can’t see the insulation for the walls

Before the five-star regulations began in 2005, Tony Isaacs recalls, the building industry campaigned vigorously against the rules.

“There was a lot of fear among builders because it was a big change,” he says. “But because of the size of the change there was also a view [in government] that, strictly speaking, there should be an additional inspection – particularly for insulation.”

The extra check was not introduced. At the time, Mr Isaacs was the project manager responsible for the new regulations at the (then) Sustainable Energy Authority Victoria. He also developed FirstRate, the software tool commonly used in Victoria to analyse the efficiency of housing designs.

Now senior research fellow at RMIT’s Centre for Design, Mr Isaacs says both the house energy raters and the actual buildings must be assessed more rigorously.

“There needs to be some checking done of the people who do the ratings in the first place, to make sure they’re accurate,” Mr Isaacs says.

“Someone has to come up with the dollars to check the ratings and to check the buildings. The measures we’ve used so far have clearly got holes through which people can get away with building to a lesser standard, and unless we check them more rigorously we just don’t know how well they’re performing.”

Building the ratings into a home

Chris Jensen, from Greensphere Consulting, has conducted over 10,000 house energy ratings. He also lectures in building energy modelling at the University of Melbourne’s architecture faculty.

But when he came to renovate his own home in Port Melbourne, he was shocked at the disconnection between the software modelling and the finished product.

“We’re at lock up stage, and I could have put cheese in the walls. There’s no point at which the energy efficiency measures in the building really get checked. As the builder, I’m just expected to have met that standard, because that’s what the building permit states,” he says.

He says that while he strongly supports the energy rating system, he is concerned about the way it translates into built houses.

“Insulation, gaps and cracks are the main issues, because you can’t see them. The other big worry is that the report doesn’t make it easy for builders to understand what’s required,” he says.

“My house could be built at two-star, if it wasn’t done properly, and I wouldn’t know. It really is that bad.”

Read this article at The Age online

Smart garden watering

In Greener Homes on May 16, 2011

A new web guide will help straighten your irrigation

MELBOURNE has begun 2011 with record rainfall, but there’s no guarantee that the lush times will continue. The Bureau of Meteorology predicts that the La Niña conditions that brought the big wet will dissipate by wintertime.

By historical terms, the city’s dams are still low, and stage two water restrictions will remain at least until spring. That means householders still aren’t allowed to water their lawns from the mains. Gardens, however, can be watered by hand at any time, or every second day, at specified times, with manual and automatic irrigation systems. (You can find the full details about stage two restrictions on the Melbourne Water website.)

Geoff Connellan, from the University of Melbourne’s School of Land and Environment, says that just because we can water more often, doesn’t mean we should.

“The most common mistake people make in their gardens is to over-water, because they don’t understand how much water different plants need and how much moisture can be stored in the soil,” he says.

Together with Dr Jon Pearce and a team from the university, Mr Connellan has spent five years developing a free, online tool, called Smart Garden Watering, which helps you understand how to give your garden the right amount of water at the right time.

Using the website, you can calculate your water needs by entering all the details of your garden, including the location, size, slope and soil conditions, as well as the watering method and the types of plants and mulch.

The program draws on localised climate data and soil conditions, together with a database called the Burnley Plant Directory, which comprises over 1500 Australian and exotic plants.

Because it requires such detailed local data, the system is only available to residents in Melbourne and Geelong – for now, at least. “It does calculations for your postcode,” Mr Connellan says. “That’s important, because if you think of a garden in Sunbury and a garden in Olinda, they’re two totally different scenarios.”

The site is sprinkled with facts and features. It includes a Facebook application as well as maps, photos and forums that allow users to see other people’s gardens in their area, contact the gardeners and learn from each other’s experiences.

You can also plug in the details of your water tanks and see their likely storage levels throughout the year, based on the irrigation needs of the garden.

The results can be used not only to help you better understand your plants, but also to see what would happen if you re-designed your backyard. The website is interactive – you can toy with the settings and see how they affect your water consumption.

“It’s a sophisticated tool, but we’ve found that once people have become used to it, they are happy to play around with the options,” Mr Connellan says. “For example, if you choose drip irrigation or spray irrigation, or mulch or no mulch, you can see the consumption changing.

“That’s a very powerful graphical tool for a user. It encourages people to select efficient irrigation methods, and plants with low water needs.”

As a general tip, Mr Connellan recommends drip irrigation systems, underneath a layer of mulch of between 50 and 75 millimetres.

“Most people with plumbed watering systems can save about a third of the water they’re using, if they water wisely.”

Read this article at The Age online

Solar panel rebate update

In Greener Homes on May 8, 2011

To find the right solar panel, you can’t beat thorough research

THE rebate for residential solar panels has changed, yet again. From the start of July, the cash back available from the federal government will be cut by between $2000 and $2500.

Solar retailers and installers are experiencing a rush of demand before the fall. Many are already booked up until the new financial year, and those that aren’t yet are warning customers to get in quickly.

So if you’re considering purchasing a solar photovoltaic system, it’s worthwhile investigating your options now. But if you miss the deadline, all is not lost – prices may not rise too much.

The federal rebate is based on the trading value of ‘small-scale technology certificates’ (formerly known as RECs), which are created when solar hot water and solar electricity systems are installed. Presently, householders receive a credit of five times the certificate price, but the recent glut of installations has meant that the price – and therefore, the rebate – is lower than usual.

The multiplier will be cut to three from mid-year, and progressively reduced until 2013.

Russell Marsh, policy director at the Clean Energy Council, says the strong Australian dollar and falling costs in the industry mean that despite a smaller rebate, the price of a system won’t increase significantly in the second half of the year.

“Costs are coming down quicker than most people expected. The market is booming – there could be nearly 300,000 houses with systems on their roofs before the end of this year. We suspect [the rebate change] will have a small impact on price,” he says.

Mr Marsh says a good quality, 1.5-kilowatt system will set you back about $4000, out of pocket, depending on installation costs. For an average household, the payback period is around seven years.

If your head isn’t spinning already, you also need to consider the state rebates, known as ‘feed-in tariffs’. In Victoria, power retailers credit panel-owners 60 cents per kilowatt-hour for any surplus energy they feed into the grid (for the next fifteen years).

But new owners may soon miss out. “That premium tariff has a limit and we expect it to be reached within the next six months, or sooner,” Mr Marsh says.

Of course, there’s much more to consider than prices and rebates. To help, the Clean Energy Council has produced a detailed guide to buying solar panels. It covers basic information about the technology and its suitability for your home, together with a checklist for installation and comprehensive lists of questions to ask retailers and tradespeople.

For even more information, try the articles and podcasts put together by Choice.

Ingrid Just, from the consumer advocate, says a 1.5-kilowatt system produces about a third of the energy used by an average household.

“Firstly, get into the habit of reducing your energy consumption,” she says. “Australians tend to use a lot of electricity, so you should look at how much panel capacity you actually need.”

Before you buy anything, be sure to research thoroughly: ask your energy retailer about the tariffs it offers panel-owners and get quotes from a number of retailers and installers.

“Make sure you’re using an accredited installer and that any panel you consider meets Australian Standards,” she says. “Look for a warranty of 25 years from a company you trust.”

Read this article at The Age online

Home composting

In Greener Homes on May 1, 2011

A mix of ingredients will put your compost on the top of the heap

GARDENING guru and landscape architect Costa Georgiadis can’t get enough vegie scraps. To feed his chooks and worms, and his compost pile, he imports peelings from neighbours.

“I’ve got a bin at the front and another one on the side street and my neighbours drop their scraps in them,” he says. “It’s a wonderful resource and everyone has it.”

Today marks the start of International Composting Awareness Week. To celebrate, Cultivating Community and Yarra City Council are holding a ‘Composter’s Composium’ next Saturday, May 7, at Smith Reserve in Fitzroy, from 11 am. The event will be a humus-inducing extravaganza, complete with live music, a workshop by Mr Georgiadis and (nearly) every kind of composting contraption known to urban living.

Lisa Coffa, senior waste officer at the council, says organic waste still comprises over half the kerbside collection, by weight. “It imposes great demands on our infrastructure and requires a lot of resources to pick up,” she says.

But that’s not all – every tonne of green waste in landfill causes about a tonne of greenhouse gas emissions. Ms Coffa says composting is a low cost, low-tech, local solution. Most councils, including Yarra, offer residents a discount on worm farms and bins, as well as advice on how to do it right.

“For most people, it’s very easy to convert green waste into something productive,” she says. “If you’re composting, you are better connected to your food source. It makes the link between what you purchase and what you throw away.”

For his part, Mr Georgiadis likens composting to cooking. “When you make compost, you transform the ingredients into something edible, with the help of microbes and worms and plants. You’re actually a chef, cooking your own chemical-free elixir.”

His first tip is to prepare well. “Compost gets a bad wrap when people do it half-heartedly,” he says. “You need to have the ingredients on hand, otherwise you’ll end up with a lasagne that only has pasta in it – and then it will become a seething, smelly, gooey mess.”

In the kitchen, get yourself a sealable container to stop vinegar flies from invading. In the garden, choose a shady spot and set up dedicated, covered spaces for several materials. You’ll need to mix the nitrogen-rich kitchen scraps with carbon-rich brown stuff, such as dried leaves, straw, shredded paper and cardboard.

Other items on Mr Georgiadis’ recipe include manure, green garden clippings, rock minerals and soil. Make sure you’ve also got a watering can handy and a corkscrew-style aerator (about $20) or garden fork for turning the heap.

“The key to any composting system is diversity, so every time you add something, add some of the other elements as well. Water it, turn it, cover it and let it do its thing,” he says.

Once the bin is full, you’ll need to leave it for about two months (but keep turning it every week) while you start a second batch.

When it’s done, to test if your mix is right, Mr Georgiadis suggests grabbing a handful. “If you squeeze firmly, you should see a little liquid running along the bottom of your pinky. If a whole lot of juice comes out, you need more carbon material; if nothing comes out, you need more water.”

Read this article at The Age online

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • …
  • 76
  • Next Page »

Archive

    • ►Print
      • ►Environment
      • ►Social justice
      • ►Community development
      • ►Culture
    • ►Blog
    • ►Audio
    • ►Projects

© Copyright 2017 Michael Green · All Rights Reserved