Michael Green

Writer and producer

  • About
  • Print
  • Audio
  • Podcast
  • Projects
  • Book
  • Twitter

Repair Cafe

In Community development, Environment on June 26, 2012

IN October 2009, Martine Postma coordinated the first Repair Café, in Amsterdam. Why? Because we all throw out way too much good stuff. And then we manufacture more not-so-good stuff, so we can throw that out too. And now we have a giant global shit-storm of environmental problems.

What to do? Postma’s idea is to get volunteer repairers together with people who have broken things.

Repair Cafés are now running in dozens of locations in the Netherlands. They’re regular events, she explains, organised by locals, for locals. People bring all kinds of knick-knacks: busted blenders, moth-eaten woolen jumpers and toy cars with loose wheels.

“Many things can be fixed – often it’s not hard and lots of fun,” she says. “We call them ‘cafés’ because they’re not just about repairing, but about meeting people, chatting, learning and getting inspired.

“At the first Repair Café, the atmosphere was so positive it struck me as somewhat unreal – as if we were back in the ’60s, with love and peace. But now I’m used to it.”

The expert repairers range from professional craftspeople to enthusiastic retirees, like one old mechanic who attends the Amsterdam café. “He can repair almost everything,” Postma says. “He’s a genius with electrical appliances, but he can also mend the broken handle of a suitcase, for example. He is precise and takes his time. I think he’s never happier than when he’s working with his tools.”

Postma is a keen fixer herself, and when she’s not too busy she likes to build bookshelves. But these days, she hasn’t the time. She’s devoting all her energy to the revolution: the Repair Café foundation, her project to “spread the idea all over the Netherlands and Europe and the rest of the Western world.”

Fetch your broken toasters.

Published in Smith Journal, Winter 2012.

Switching to solar

In Architecture and building, Environment on June 3, 2012

As electricity prices increase, more people are turning to solar power to reduce their reliance on the electricity grid. For those who want to make the switch, here are the basics of solar PV.

THERE’S a basic fact that a surprisingly large number of people haven’t yet grasped about solar energy. “We still get queries from people who get solar photovoltaics mixed up with solar water heating,” says Mick Harris, managing director of eco-retailer EnviroGroup. “It’s really a matter of understanding what you want.”

It’s a simple point, but it underscores the most important thing prospective panel purchasers need to do – research well.

Your deliberations will be detailed, from the technology and rebates to installation issues and variable electricity charges. But don’t be put off – once the panels are in place, maintenance is minimal. For at least 20 years, you’ll be able to sit back and enjoy the sunshine.

Open publication – Free publishing – More green home

Technology

There are three common types of solar PV panels: monocrystalline, polycrystalline and thin film. Most of the panels sold in Australia are of the mono and poly kind. Thin film is much less efficient – it needs nearly double the roof space of other panels – but requires far less silicon to make and has less embodied energy. Lance Turner of the Alternative Technology Association adds that there is also a hybrid panel made by Sanyo which is a combination of crystalline and thin film technologies. “These perform particularly well,” he says, “but at a price premium.”

As well as the panels on the roof your system will need an inverter, which converts the DC (direct current) electricity produced by the panels to AC (alternating current) and feeds any excess electricity into the grid.

‘Building-integrated’ photovoltaic systems such as tiles, facades or glazing are uncommon. Susan Neill, from engineering consultancy Global Sustainable Energy Solutions, says those systems are much more expensive: “It tends to be driven by airports or iconic buildings that want to make a statement by putting it in.”

Rebate madness

For the solar PV industry in Australia and for households it’s been the best of times and the worst of times. Let’s start with the worst: changes to government rebates.

The Federal Government’s cash-back rebate is based on the trading value of ‘small-scale technology certificates’ (STCs, formerly known as RECs), which are created when renewable energy systems are installed. Right now, eligible householders receive a credit of three times the certificate price, which fluctuates according to market demand. From July 1, the credit will be reduced to two, meaning the rebate for householders will fall by one-third.

Most of the incentives offered by state governments have also been cut. These feed-in tariff schemes pay people according to how much energy a household supplies to the grid. Queensland’s feed-in tariff is the last one intact – elsewhere they’ve been reduced, phased out or abolished overnight.

Tim Sonnreich, policy manager at the Clean Energy Council, says that despite these cuts there is good news for household solar PV that shouldn’t be overlooked. Overall the price hasn’t increased significantly, thanks to lower production costs and the high Australian dollar. A 1.5kW grid-connect system can cost from $1500 to $6000 installed (including the federal rebate).

“The price of solar technology has come down dramatically over the last few years,” he says. “Even five years ago, buying solar was a major financial decision, like buying a car. But now it’s in the ballpark of $2000, people put it on their credit card and get on with their lives. The market has changed dramatically.”

What size system should I get?

The answer to the all-important question of size, says Mick Harris, will become clear when you ask three additional questions. “Firstly, how much room have you got? That’s going to limit how much you can put on your house,” he explains. “Secondly, how much of your energy bill do you want to get rid of? And thirdly, what is your budget?”

Shade is death for solar panels, especially the mono and polycrystalline kind. Even a small amount of shading significantly reduces the efficiency of the whole system, so there’s no point buying one if you have a mighty big tree blocking the sun. Ideally, for a small system, you’ll need at least 10 square metres of roof space facing north.

Next, take a good look at your electricity bill and make note of how much you use. The average Australian household consumes 18 kilowatt-hours (kWh) a day, according to the Clean Energy Council. The output of panels varies throughout the country, but a 1.5kW system will offset roughly a third of the average daily consumption.

At this point in the research process, it’s wise to think more broadly about where you use the electricity you consume. If you have an electric hot water service, it probably accounts for about a quarter of your bill, Sonnreich says. “Hot water is a major expense, so if you don’t have much rooftop space, solar hot water might give you a better return than PV.”

Installation

Up to half the cost of your solar electricity system will go towards its installation, and as with any job around the house, you’ll want to make sure it’s done well.

The output of your panels will vary significantly according to their orientation, access to full sun, and whether they’re angled appropriately for your latitude. With that in mind, quiz your solar company about all these requirements, and about their installers’ experience.

To be eligible for the rebates and feed-in tariffs, you must use an installer accredited by the Clean Energy Council. “You must use an accredited installer in order to be able to access the upfront discount provided by the Small Technology Certificates (STCs) that are traded back through the renewable energy market,” says Damien Moyse from the ATA. He adds that when choosing a system and an installer, it’s best not to just choose the cheapest one. “Solar, like any other technology, depends on quality for performance, and you want a system that will generate for at least 20 to 30 years. Consider the warranties closely and be prepared to pay a little more upfront for a good-quality system that will provide you plenty of savings on your electricity bill over time.”

Susan Neill suggests that before buying you should request an indication of the panels’ performance. “Ask for a performance guarantee that the system will produce a certain number of kilowatt-hours per year, on average, for your location,” she says. “Then you’ll have the knowledge to check it yourself.” Likewise, seek a long-term warranty (up to 25 years) and make sure you keep hold of the documentation.

Energy retailers and distributors

You need to let your energy retailer know if you’re going to install a solar PV system. Many retailers will offer you a premium for the electricity you export to the electricity grid, but don’t be bamboozled by that rate alone: make sure you find out what your new tariff and fee structure will be.

“You have to ask the whole question – how much is it really going to change your bill?” Sonnreich says. “You might get a better rate for the power you export, but you might pay more for the power you import. Do the sums on everything.”

And while you’re speaking to the energy companies, ask them about your new meter – who will supply it, how will it work and how much will it cost?

Off-grid systems

Stand-alone renewable energy systems are much more expensive upfront than grid-connected systems. As well as the panels, you’ll need batteries, a regulator to manage the way they charge and possibly a backup generator.

After the Victorian bushfires in 2010, the ATA commissioned research into the cost of off-grid systems compared to grid infrastructure.

“The capital cost is high compared with grid connect,” says Damien Moyse, “but if you have an efficiently operating house, then you can set up one of these systems for $20,000 to $30,000 and it’s going to generate electricity for at least 20 years and longer.”

Is there any cause to go off-grid in the city? Smart meters now allow retailers to set time-of-use tariffs that incorporate high rates for peak time energy use. “If you are a household that cannot avoid consuming energy during these peak times, the long-term cost of installing batteries and electricity backup may become an attractive option,” Moyse says. “However, in most circumstances this will not yet be the case and a grid-connect system will still offer plenty of opportunity to avoid peak rates.”

Ask lots of questions

Some local councils or community sustainability groups still coordinate bulk purchases, though they’re less common than they once were. If you haven’t the time or the head for research, these schemes are a good source of information.

Even so, start your research with the Clean Energy Council’s consumer guide to buying solar panels. It contains a comprehensive list of questions to ask, but the legwork is up to you. “Shop around. Don’t make a snap decision,” Sonnreich suggests. “Find a company that is prepared to talk the issues through with you.”

Mick Harris also recommends some sleuthing. “There’s a mixture of players out there in the market – some of them are good and some are not so good,” he says.

If you google a solar retailer, together with the words ‘problems’ or complaints, you’ll soon find out which is which. It’s also worth checking the popular forums on the Whirlpool and ATA websites. “You can protect yourself from the worst of the companies by doing some homework online,” Harris says.

This article was published in Sanctuary Magazine.

Farming on the fringe: Q&A with Dave Sands

In Architecture and building, Environment on March 16, 2012

Dave Sands, former regional director of the ministry of agriculture, in British Columbia, Canada.

Why should people care about peri-urban agriculture?

FOR me, it’s agriculture. It just seems that the best farmland quite often is around the city. The city starts where the best climate is, and the flat land. In British Columbia, about 35 years ago the government realised we were burning up our best farmland and that’s when they stepped in and formed an agricultural land reserve.

It’s for the security of food production for future generations. With the cost of oil rising, shipping food will be very expensive. In Canada, 75 per cent of our food comes from the States. The Americans are burning up their prime farmland. We can’t rely on another country all the time to supply our food.

Can you explain how the land reserve works?

It’s only 5 per cent of the whole land base of the province. If you have a piece of land in the reserve and you want to subdivide it, there’s a special commission set up to oversee what’s good for agriculture. So if somebody said ‘I’m growing this crop and the market is down, I want my land out of the reserve so I can survive’, they say ‘I’m sorry, you either sell it as a farm or you ride it like everybody else’. The economics don’t come into it.

I bet the farmers didn’t like that, when it was brought in?

No. But when the farmers said ‘You’re locking us in’, that government made up a formula to make sure they got a fair return on their investment. For about seven years, they paid the farmers sometimes if the market went down, and it got them onside. What it was saying to the farmers was you’re giving up some rights for the good of the community therefore we’ll help you through it. And now, you get people buying in there, but they’re buying into the agricultural land reserve, they know what the law is. It’s very difficult now for them to chop up a piece of land.

The main question people always ask is ‘Where are you going to build your houses?’ But the first thing should be, ‘How are you going to feed the people?’ If it doesn’t affect your food to take that land, that’s fine. You have to reverse it – first tell us how you’re going to feed everyone. It seems so far off now, but it’s making plans for future, that’s the hardest thing sometimes to do, and that’s what we’ve done.

How does city fringe farming compare to urban agriculture?

People are talking about urban agriculture, but really it’s not agriculture – it’s gardening. Realistically, it would take thousands of these community gardens for one farm in our Fraser Valley. The answer is at the edge where that farmland is, and keeping those farmers farming.

Is this about thinking about the food system as a whole?

One thing about food is that everybody needs it. It’s one of those few things. A shortage of food would bother people. But the food system is taken for granted. We eat three times a day and we don’t ever think about it. It’s always there. For lots of people in the world it’s never there. But, for us, we’re so healthy and rich, we’re living at probably the best time we’ve ever had and nobody believes it’s going to end.

But the other thing is that now around the world, something happens in one country and everything falls. We haven’t ever been here before, there are 7 billion people and in 2040 we’re going to be 9 billion people. We’re struggling now and about one-third of the agricultural land has problems, and desertification is increasing.

Farmland and oil go hand in hand, because as oil becomes more and more expensive, we’re going to look around and say, ‘Well, let’s grow it here’. But we’re giving away thousands of acres we could have saved.

See a video of Dave Sands speaking about the agricultural reserve, at the On the Edge forum, run by Village Well. 

Farming on the fringe: Q&A with Anna Meroni

In Environment on January 10, 2012

Anna Meroni, from Nutrire Milano (Feeding Milan), visited Australia recently for the On the Edge forum, run by Village Well.

Why should people care about agriculture on the city fringe?

I AM a designer – I believe that people really understand something when they are touched by the issue, not because of rational drivers. If I have to convince someone that the food produced just close to the city is important, I would say that it’s a matter of wellbeing and wellness of the whole environment. Frankly speaking, sometimes there is no added value in quality, but it’s better because of the story of that food. The more green you can keep around the town, the better the air and the quality of your life because you can find a place nearby you really enjoy.

I’ve often been asked by people, ‘What changes in reality my body if I eat an organic tomato while I’m breathing the air of a town which is very polluted?’ Okay, nothing changes – it is not the tomato that will save your life. But the more you eat sustainable things the more you increase the possibility for your town to be less polluted.

Tell me about the project you’re working on?

In 2015 we will host the international expo in Milan and the tile of it will be ‘Feeding the planet, energy for life’. Over a bottle of wine with the people from Slow Food, we said this is a huge problem because it will be an opportunity for Milan to build more instead of less.

We decided to design another scenario for a sustainable Milan in 2015 where the biggest possible quantity of food consumed in town is produced around the town. We named this project ‘Feeding Milan, energy for change’.

In the south of Milan there is a safeguarded agricultural area, which is around 50,000 hectares. You can build on a percentage of the space, but you have to cultivate the land.

We said let’s start from the good practices we find and help them grow, because emulation is a very powerful tool. You cannot do things from scratch. Find the best, connect the best and try to support them to become leaders of bigger transformation.

We started by opening up a farmers’ market following the rules of the Slow Food markets. It was the first in Milan. We decided to open an ideas-sharing stall where we do a design activity with producers and visitors, and we use it as a first contact point for new ideas to come about.

We try to create a broader range of services for people who want to buy local food and for producers who want to deliver local food. It’s too much for farmers to work at the market more than once a month – for the rest of the time you need to find other solutions which are not the traditional retail system, like a food box for delivery at home, or pick your own like you have here for strawberries, or collaborative supermarkets. This is more or less the philosophy: try to widen the scope of zero mile production and consumption.

How easy will it be to scale up these kinds of schemes?

We all believe very much strongly in the power of bottom-up initiatives. In Milan, through these small initiatives we’ve been able to create a huge pressure from the public. But what is very clear to all of us is that new business models are needed, where there is a mix of public and private initiatives, profit and not-for-profit, consumers and producers.

The rules of the public policy have been made according to the traditional way of retailing food, with companies, big retailers. What we are seeing now is that there are these purchasing groups such as community-supported agriculture, initiatives led by consumers or by farmers, which are in between profit and not-for-profit, which have struggled to find a formal identity according to the law. They are often categorised as black market because they don’t find any other way to exist. We need policies to encourage these brand new ways of making social business. They must have a legal framework to exist and operate otherwise we won’t really evolve. This is first.

I’d like to see brand new protection policies. So far we have seen that food policy has protected certain kind of situation and institution: the big multinationals. But there are other places that need to be protected. It would create a lot of discussion and debate, but I’d like to see certain fragile economies protected with special rules, and with a clear ethical distinction between good and bad farming practices.

Watch a video of Anna’s presentation here.

Farming on the fringe

In Architecture and building, Environment, The Age on December 4, 2011

What will we reap when agriculture moves away from town?

IF you drive through Clyde, on the south-eastern outskirts of Melbourne, you’ll see the old farms where a new, very different, crop is being sown.

Next to the market gardens and green paddocks still lined with windbreaks are expanses of soil dotted with earthmovers and giant concrete pipes. On these properties, houses will become the next harvest of the land.

Melbourne’s urban growth boundary was extended last year and is under review yet again. In May, the state government appointed an advisory committee to recommend “logical inclusions” to the boundary in seven municipalities on the city’s fringe.

In Clyde, the City of Casey opposes any further extension (pdf), and argues instead for “logical exclusions” from last year’s ruling. In its submission to the committee, it stated that the boundary has already exceeded a sustainable limit.

Kathryn Seirlis, the council’s manager of strategic development, says the current and former governments haven’t given enough weight to the role of agriculture in the region, especially in creating employment and improving health and wellbeing.

“We think it’s critically important to protect viable, high value agricultural land for the future communities of Casey and beyond,” she says.

The controversy over Clyde fits within a larger debate about farming on the city’s fringes. The issue was the subject of a recent forum on “peri-urban agriculture”, coordinated by placemaking consultancy Village Well.

Trevor Budge, associate professor of planning at Latrobe University, argues good soil should be managed like any other resource. “If you found a supply of building sand or gravel, you wouldn’t just build over the top of it, you’d treat it as a finite resource,” he says.

“From everything we know – whether it’s climate change, peak oil, energy costs or transport costs – having productive agricultural land close to the city makes us more resilient for the future.”

Mr Budge says constant shifts and reviews have turned the urban growth boundary into a “zone of impermanence”. Many farmers and landowners outside expect to be re-zoned inside, and don’t keep investing in their land.

It’s a problem acknowledged by the Growth Areas Authority, the statutory body charged with coordinating the development of new suburbs.

“One of the problems in the past has been short term, knee-jerk reactions, with huge numbers of people all expecting make a lot of money by being [re-zoned] in the next new residential area,” says Peter Seamer, CEO of the authority.

He says the latest round of reviews is different, and will set aside enough residential land for decades to come. “The processes we’re going through will be sorted out by government in the next few months and they’ll set a very clear direction for the next 25 years,” he says.

Mr Seamer says that although “no one likes to see a reduction in farming land”, urban growth comprises a very small proportion of Victoria’s total farmland.

“The growth has got to go somewhere,” he says. “There was a crisis in the middle of last year, when prices for land went up very steeply because there was a shortage of supply, particularly in the Casey area.”

The state government has not yet released the findings of the logical inclusions process.

But the Casey council has foreshadowed using its planning tools to support farming within the growth boundary, even if its submission is rejected. Together with the Cardinia and Mornington Peninsula councils, Casey has been working on a plan to establish the Bunyip Food Belt, a zone of intensive agriculture that would draw on recycled water from the Eastern Treatment Plant.

Mr Budge accepts that Australia isn’t running short on agricultural land, but says proximity to the population makes all the difference.

“Growing food is part and parcel of the way cities operate. The better metropolitan strategies around the world make agriculture one of the core social and economic components of their plans – not something that sits off the edge and can be pushed further out,” he says.

As well as the added security afforded by a short food-supply chain, he says peri-urban farming also improves wellbeing. “Having contact with nature and an understanding of where food comes from is good for us socially and psychologically. It maintains the contact with the real world that we’ve had for 10,000 years of human history.”

Trading herbs for suburbs

IT’S the end of a normal day on the farm at Australian Fresh Leaf Herbs, in Clyde, just beyond Cranbourne.

While the packing workers tidy the cool room before heading home, banker-turned-farmer William Pham gestures at the rows of hydroponic basil in front of him. “We recycle our water, so we need one-sixteenth of the water for conventionally grown basil,” he explains.

Together with his business partner Jan Vydra and their 60 casual and full-time staff, Mr Pham produces and packages 70,000 bunches of herbs each week.

They began operations here in 2008, but their farm was included in the revised urban growth boundary in 2010. They’re looking for land elsewhere. “When we bought here, this road was empty,” Mr Pham says. “Now you can’t recognise it. The development has happened much faster than I expected.”

Mr Vydra, who was recently named the 2011 Young Australian Farmer of the Year, says he wants to stay within 40 minutes of the city. That kind of proximity is better for business: it’s easier to find workers, supplies are cheaper and more accessible, and the cost of transporting the produce is lower.

But once the boundary expands, property values rise and rates increase. “That’s what happens – you have to sell up. It’s beautiful soil around the whole area at Clyde. People have been farming it for 100 years and they have to move,” he says.

“There’s an economic benefit – we get much more money for our property – but as a community, we lose some really fertile soil and they’re going to put slabs on top of it.”

Although he can see the dilemma for planners, who want to provide affordable housing, he’s worried about food security as older farmers retire. “We need to figure out what’s being produced here and how we’re going to shift it elsewhere to make sure we keep producing food for our people.”

Mr Pham is ambivalent about the change: he says small-time farmers will disappear, but doesn’t think there’ll be any impact on shoppers. “A lot of the smaller growers will sell up, make their money and have an easier lifestyle.

“We spent a lot of money on this place, so what the heck – we may as well do it again. We’re too young to retire. We just have to move further out.”

Read this article at The Age online and watch Trevor Budge’s talk on the importance of peri-urban agriculture in Australia, at the On The Edge Forum.

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • …
  • 17
  • Next Page »

Archive

    • ▼Print
      • ▼Environment
        • Contested territory
        • Community power
        • The last drop of water in Broken Hill
        • Totally Renewable Yackandandah
        • Electric vehicles lead the charge
        • You can never have too much garlic
        • Renewed interest in renewables
        • Reviving the race on a cleaner Yarra
        • Interview with Kevin Anderson
        • Renewable energy: power to the people
        • Left to pick up the pieces
        • Mining morality or vilifying coal?
        • A stake in the business
        • Round and round we go
        • A death in the family
        • Smarter urban water
        • Little fox, big problem
        • Flirting with disaster
        • Into the wind
        • The Great Barrier Reef: just unwell or terminally ill?
        • Seams of discontent
        • Bill McKibben
        • Unburnable carbon
        • Gelato at Brunetti's
        • The living fossil
        • Climate adaptation plan: the devil is in the appendix
        • Interview with Annie Leonard
        • Planning for a climate disaster
        • Bursting the carbon bubble
        • Doing the legwork
        • Repair Cafe
        • Switching to solar
        • Farming on the fringe: Q&A with Dave Sands
        • Farming on the fringe: Q&A with Anna Meroni
        • Farming on the fringe
        • Overshadowing
        • Greg Hatton's factory
        • Q&A: The Sharehood
        • Q&A with Carolyn Steel
        • Greener apartment blocks
        • Star ratings on the ground
        • Down to earth
        • Pacific islands face change that's hard to believe in
        • Life cycle assessment
        • Green renters
        • House energy ratings
        • Food glorious food!
        • 'Cash for clunkers' is a lemon
        • The shadow in the valley
        • Meet your neighbours
        • Six-star homes
        • Greensburg, Kansas
        • Towns in Transition
        • Sustainable House Day
        • Primate fear
        • The biggest catch
        • Close encounters: why medium-density living is the way of the future
        • Vegetable Power
        • From blue to green
        • Rubbish to riches
        • The old and the new
        • Teaming up and powering down
        • The green payoff
        • Power from the ground up
        • Permaculture club
        • Best footprint forward
        • Thinking outside the bin
        • They all want to change the world
        • When good neighbours become green
        • Beyond the stars: the rise and rise of domestic power use
        • Block busters: why apartment owners are seeing green
        • High five: why the new renovation rating is all about smart design
        • The lambs in winter
        • Global cooling
        • Waste not
        • Tour of duty
        • Powering down
        • Picking up the pieces
        • Pooling resources for a green future
        • Distance education
        • Globe trotter
      • ►Social justice
      • ►Community development
      • ►Culture
    • ►Blog
    • ►Audio
    • ►Projects

© Copyright 2017 Michael Green · All Rights Reserved